Objections to the proposed electorates and boundaries are listed below.
Submissions may have been edited to remove contact information or other personal details, or to remove objectionable material. Submissions which only address issues the Representation Commission cannot consider have not been published.
Between 8 and 21 May you can have your say on issues raised in these objections.
Displaying
571 - 600 of
636
Number | Name | Submission | Change type | View |
---|---|---|---|---|
S05001 | Reese Dillimore | Objection | Boundary | |
Reese DillimoreObjection
Christchurch East
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change
Reese DillimoreI think that Redwood shouldn't be moved into Christchurch East (see map screenshot). The suburb of Redwood isn't in East Christchurch in terms of both geography and community. West Linwood (see map screenshot), as it is part of the suburb of Linwood, is, however, in East Christchurch.Suggested solutionKeep Redwood in Christchurch Central, but move West Linwood, bounded by Cashel Street and Fitzgerald Avenue (see the attached maps), into Christchurch East. If necessary and/or feasible, I also optionally suggest moving a section of Bromley, bounded by Linwood Avenue (see map screenshot), from Banks Peninsula into Christchurch East, as the rest of Bromley is already in the electorate. |
||||
S05002 | Stuart Laing | Objection | Boundary | |
Stuart LaingObjection
Christchurch East
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change
Stuart LaingThe transfer of parts of the suburb of Redwood from the Christchurch Central electorate to the Christchurch East Electorate.Talking with residents in the affected area, they say that their focus is more on the Christchurch Central Electorate than it is on the Christchurch East Electorate. Their City Council Ward is based in Papnui Their City Council Service Centre, Library and Recreation Centre are all in Papnui within the Christchurch Central Electorate. Their children attend Papanui High, Marion College, St Bedes and St Joseph's. They shop at Northlands, Northlink, Papanui Main Street Shops and the new supermarket on the Main North Road. If they need to venture further afield, they travel down the Papanui Road to the City Centre. Their focus is the centre and not to the east. Suggested solutionI suggest that the area of Redwood be retained within the Christchurch Central Electorate and that an area of Linwood bounded by Avonside Drive, Linwood Avenue, Aldwins Road, and Harrow Street, Tuam Street be transferred to Christchurch East Electorate. This would create a balance to the population in the Redwood area that would not be transfered.I have attached 4 files "Redwood", which shows the Meshblocks and Population of the area "Linwood", which shows the Meshblocks and population of the Area "Linwood Addition", which shows the Meshblocks and Population that could be added to the Linwood area to be transferred to make for a slightly more elegant mapping arrangement. "Linwood plus addition" shows the "Linwood" area in Orange and the Linwood Addition area in Purple. |
||||
S06001 | Mrs Kerry Coogan | Objection | Boundary | |
Mrs Kerry CooganObjection
Christchurch Central
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change
Mrs Kerry CooganMy preference is to stay with the smaller council. I am aware of the people representing my district. |
||||
S06002 | Mrs Kylie Jay | Objection | Boundary | |
Mrs Kylie JayObjection
Christchurch Central
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change
Mrs Kylie JayLiving in spreydon most issues that arise or have an influence on our place of residence fall in line with the happenings of the wigram electorate. This arising in central christchurch vary greatly to the needs of the spredyon community.Suggested solutionLeave spreydon as part of the wigram electorate. |
||||
S06003 | Mr Justinus Avi Yudistira | Objection | Boundary | |
Mr Justinus Avi YudistiraObjection
Christchurch Central
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change
Mr Justinus Avi YudistiraI propose to straighten up the boundaries of Christchurch Central, to follow natural boundaries and Christchurch City Council ward boundaries.Instead of cutting Redwood in half, I propose to move the entirety of Redwood (north of Northcote Rd) to Christchurch East. This would simplify and reduce confusion to Redwood residents. This will benefit both electorates, as Christchurch East is losing population, this change will assist in reducing the changes that could be made in the next boundary review, and Christchurch Central, as the name suggest, would not expand too much to Northern Christchurch. I understand Christchurch East could go a little bit above quota, and this could be reversed by giving away areas around Aldwins Road to Christchurch Central, this is to follow the local boundary between the Central Ward and Linwood Ward around Te Aratai College. However, if Christchurch East is still on quota at this point, I believe the last sentence is not necessary, or the changes mentioned above can be minimised e.g. putting just the areas above Tuckers Rd to Christchurch East, as a compromise, at least it will straighten up the boundary, instead of the current one that awkwardly swoops through Redwood Park. I support the inclusion of Papanui to Ilam, as this will help Ilam in the next Boundary Review, as Ilam is losing population. On the southern end, I propose to adjust the Banks Peninsula and Christchurch Central boundary to follow the boundary of Cashmere and Heathcote wards, which means the boundary will follow Milton St, Colombo St, and Tennyson St before following the Opawaho/Heathcote River. This change ensures that Christchurch Central, again as the name suggest, did not go to deep into Southern Christchurch. This will also enable Christchurch Central to 'straighten up' the boundary with Wigram, which I propose to simply follow Barrington St and Whitleigh Ave, instead of swooping in and out and splitting Spreydon. These changes will make Wigram slightly above quota, which can be addressed by returning some parts of Selwyn that are given to Wigram, specifically areas south of Leadleys Rd and Hamptons Rd, to make sure that Wigram, a Christchurch-based seat, did not reach too far into Selwyn. Suggested solution1. Move the boundary between Christchurch Central and Christchurch East to Northcote Road. If needed, a small area around Te Aratai College could be given to Christchurch Central to counteract these changes and follow the local ward boundaries.2. Adjust the boundary between Banks Peninsula and Christchurch Central to follow the boundary of Heathcote and Cashmere wards of Christchurch City Council, thus using Milton St, Colombo St and Tennyson St as boundary. 3. Straighten up the Wigram and Christchurch Central boundary to follow Barrington St and Whitleigh Ave. To counteract these, areas south of Leadleys Rd and Hamptons Rd can be returned to Selwyn. |
||||
S06004 | Mr Callum Ward | Objection | Boundary | |
Mr Callum WardObjection
Christchurch Central
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change
Mr Callum WardI object to Spreydon being removed from the Wigram electorate, on the grounds that it has long, historic ties to the Wigram seat, and constitutes a natural community with other areas of the Wigram electorate such as Hoon Hay |
||||
S06005 | Miss Elizabeth Taggart | Objection | Boundary | |
Miss Elizabeth TaggartObjection
Christchurch Central
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change
Miss Elizabeth TaggartCommenting on Wigram Electorate B. Within the proposed changes put forward are communities that identify with the above electorate and not the central city area as proposed. Addington , Spreydon and Barrington communities revolve around Barrington mall and local shopping areas, churches, sports clubs and schools which are an integral part of the Wigram electorate.As a board member on Whareora Trust House in Athelstan street we identify very strongly with that local community, meeting the needs of those in Addington and Spreydon, being part of a community served by one MP ensures continuity of information and communication. Keeping this proposed area in with Wigram, the more rural areas could be moved to near by electorates keeping the Addington/Spreydon communities within Wigram served by one the present MP |
||||
S06006 | Stephen Judd | Objection | Boundary | |
Stephen JuddObjection
Christchurch Central
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change
Stephen JuddI am a resident within the current Wigram boundary. I live on [street name] which would become part of Christchurch Central under the proposed boundary.I object to the proposed boundary because in my neighbourhood we have no community of interest with Christchurch Central. Our natural centre of activity is around Barrington Mall/Park/Library. From my point of view Christchurch Central is "the city" and the immediate ring of suburbs around it, with which we have little in common. I would expect worse representation when we are a small "island" isolated from the inner city suburbs and not socially connected to them. Suggested solutionBrougham Street and Strickland or even Colombo are more natural and obvious boundaries on our side of the electorate. I would suggest Strickland as there are few amenities that tie a community together there, while Selwyn has a nucleus with the shops etc located near Brougham. |
||||
S06007 | Ms Karolin Potter | Objection | Boundary | |
Ms Karolin PotterObjection
Christchurch Central
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change
Ms Karolin PotterI am a long-term resident of Spreydon, where I have lived for the past twenty years. Prior to that, I have lived in Christchurch for a total of forty years. I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed changes to the electorate boundary, which would see much of Spreydon—including my own address—removed to Christchurch Central.Over the decades, I have been actively involved in a wide range of local initiatives, including residential associations, school boards, schools and kindergarten committees, children's sports, and local body politics. Most recently, I served as Chair of the Spreydon-Cashmere Community Board until the last local elections. Throughout these roles, I have come to deeply appreciate the strength of Spreydon’s community fabric. While opinions may sometimes differ, our interactions are hallmarked by a deep mutual understanding grounded in shared history and experience. In Spreydon, we have one MP, one City Councillor, and a dedicated Community Board whose members know the area and its people intimately. They understand our shopping centre (Barrington Mall), key arterial routes (Lincoln and Halswell Roads), Hillmorton High School, our many primary schools, Pioneer Stadium, sports clubs, churches, and residential associations such as the Spreydon Neighbourhood Network. The proposed boundary change would unnecessarily hollow out Spreydon, severing streets and homes—including mine on [street name] —from their long-standing connections with the rest of Spreydon and the other very familiar suburbs for the first time in more than 100 years. Such a division would erode the neighbourhood’s strong historical and social ties. Spreydon faces many pressing issues—intensification of brownfield developments, transport challenges including poor bus services, environmental concerns such as a lack of native trees, and the broader threat of climate change. Addressing these issues effectively relies on cohesive community action and neighbourly support, which would be seriously undermined by splitting Spreydon between electorates. Suggested solutionI would be grateful for there to be favourable consideration given to introducing the boundary to Selwyn St which would leave Spreydon substantially intactI also note that the Selwyn and Prebbleton have a great deal of commonality of interests that are different from the older diverse suburbs of Hoon Hay, Rowley Hillmorton and Spreydon |
||||
S06008 | Levaun Matetaka | Objection | Boundary | |
Levaun MatetakaObjection
Christchurch Central
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change
Levaun MatetakaObjection To Proposed Boundary Change For Wigram ElectorateI am a resident of Spreydon and would like to formally oppose the proposed Wigram boundary by dividing Spreydon at Lyttleton and Barrington Streets and removing the eastern portion of Spreydon and Addington from this electorate. Since moving into the area in 2023, I have observed how Addington, Spreydon, Hoon Hay and Hillmorton function as one united community. The social housing complex I live in on [street name] backs onto the grounds of Addington Primary even though the community of Addington is on the other side of Brougham Street, with the Spreydon Primary school being located in Hoon Hay though it is connected to Hillmorton High School. Families from all four communities utilise the shopping centre at Barrington Mall as well as within the Addington village, the sports facilities at Spreydon Domain, and public services available at Whareora Community House (Barrington) and Hoon Hay Community Centre. The proposed boundary changes would disrupt the school community and sever local ties between Addington, Spreydon, Hoon Hay and Hillmorton of being natural, practical, social, and longstanding. Families from all four suburbs attend Hillmorton High School and Christchurch South Intermediate School, participate in shared sports teams, shop at Barrington Mall, and use community facilities like the Spreydon Domain and Hoon Hay Community Centre. Public transport, schooling catchments, and healthcare services overlap seamlessly across these areas. To run the boundary down Neville Street between Barrington Street and Lyttleton Street does not align with local realities. It splits a united urban community and disregards the organic way in which people live, interact, and relate to their surroundings. Any boundary that separates and divides the Spreydon community ignores the everyday experience of residents and cuts across genuine communities of interests, weakening our community representation and engagement. Keeping all of Spreydon, which extends naturally to Selwyn Street, and retaining Addington within the Wigram electorate ensures continuity for residents and community groups, allowing us to work with one MP who understands our shared local context and can advocate effectively for the area as a whole. Suggested solutionAs an opinion, I would recommend the eastern boundary of the Wigram electorate be retained, allowing for an already established interconnection between the Addington, Spreydon, Hoon Hay and Hillmorton communities to be preserved. With this in mind and an understanding there may need to be an electoral balance, allowing Prebbleton to remain within the Selwyn electorate due to that community aligning more naturally with the rural setting and would be better suited. I urge the Commission to reconsider the proposed changes and preserve the unity of our neighbourhood. |
||||
S06009 | Chris Russell | Objection | Boundary | |
Chris RussellObjection
Christchurch Central
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change
Chris RussellI am writing on the proposed changes to the electorate boundaries, specifically the proposal to move much of Spreydon, including my own address, into Christchurch Central.I have been a resident of Spreydon for many years and have lived in Christchurch for over thirty years. Throughout this time, it has been clear that Spreydon, Hillmorton, and Hoon Hay function as a closely connected community. Daily activities, services, and facilities are shared across these suburbs. For example, I regularly shop at Barrington Mall, attend churches such as St Mary’s, and make use of public spaces like Simeon Park. These connections are practical and longstanding. Through my experiences as both a former Chair of the Wigram LEC and as a chef working in the local hospitality industry, I have developed a strong understanding of how closely these communities are connected. In both roles, I saw firsthand families from Spreydon, Hillmorton, and Hoon Hay attend Hillmorton High School, participate in local sports clubs, shop at shared centres, and use facilities such as the Spreydon Domain and Hoon Hay Community Centre. Public transport routes, schooling zones, and healthcare services operate across these areas, reinforcing their strong community ties. The proposed boundary adjustment would divide this established community of interest. Streets and households, including mine on [street name], would be separated from their natural and practical connections to Spreydon, and its neighbouring suburbs. Such a division would not reflect the reality of how residents live, work, and engage with local services. I respectfully request that the Commission reconsider the proposed boundary changes and maintain the grouping of Spreydon, Hillmorton, and Hoon Hay within the same electorate to preserve the integrity of these community relationships. Suggested solutionI recommend that the eastern boundary of the Wigram electorate south of Brougham Street be retained at Strickland Street, in order to preserve the established and interconnected communities of Spreydon, Hillmorton, and Hoon Hay. If adjustments are required to maintain electoral balance, I suggest that less cohesive areas be considered instead; for example, the rural areas outside of Prebbleton align more naturally with the rural Selwyn electorate than urban areas with established community ties. I request that the boundary be maintained at Strickland Street, keeping Spreydon intact. |
||||
S06010 | Rowley Community Centre | Objection | Boundary | |
Rowley Community CentreObjection
Christchurch Central
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change
Rowley Community CentreI am the Manager – Tumuaki of Rowley Community Centre in Hoon Hay. The Rowley Community Centre has been in the Rowley Avenue - Hoon Hay community for over 30 years. We operate as a community-based Centre that focuses on enabling growth through the provision of services, facilities, courses and groups for the improvement of lives in the community. We provide a range of services from supporting families through the use of a community worker to assist with resourcing and support, through to the free use of phones, computers and internet access, photocopiers and scanners. We are a drop-in Centre where people can just come in and read the paper, have a chat and grab themselves a cup of tea or coffee and meet others. We have a group of volunteers who support us in a range of ways, from the work in the garden or kitchen through to the volunteer tutors. We have a range of courses available and provide cheap vegetables through the Vege Co-op that is a volunteer community initiative established throughout Christchurch. We have a meeting room, a community shed and stone carving area.We host a monthly network meeting that brings together community workers and organisations from the local area of Spreydon and Hoon Hay. For example, Project Esther Trust regularly attend these meetings. People who use our centre come from around the Rowley/Hoon Hay, Hillmorton and Spreydon areas. This is because our suburbs are interconnected and have much in common. A number of our regular users live in parts of Spreydon that the commission is proposing be moved into Christchurch Central. We are objecting to the proposed boundary as the new boundaries divide our communities and make no sense locally. In local understandings Spreydon extends out to at least Selwyn St (if not Strickland) along the eastern boundary. So, not only is Spreydon being split in half but half of Spreydon is being disconnected from its neighbours of Hoon Hay, Rowley and Hillmorton. This is not giving due regard to the community of interest that has long existed in Spreydon or with the neighbouring suburbs of Hoon Hay and Hillmorton. Barrington Mall and the associated facilities around there (GP, library etc) are as much the village centre of the people of Hoon Hay and Rowley as they are for Spreydon. This is also a major transport hub for our local people with 5 bus routes passing through Barrington. The proposed boundaries also ignore the local school zones of West Spreydon and Hillmorton. Our local schools are integral to our communities and having a dividing line through these communities would also be detrimental to our ability to advocate with our local MP. Suggested solutionSpreydon is an integral part of its wider local community and is not well served by being carved off from its community of interest. Instead, some of the more rural areas proposed to come into the Wigram electorate have more affinity with their rural neighbours and should be grouped with those communities in a single electorate. |
||||
S06011 | Mr Roy Keanneally | Objection | Boundary | |
Mr Roy KeanneallyObjection
Christchurch Central
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change
Mr Roy KeanneallyI am an elected member for the Spreydon Ward of the Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote Community Board in Christchurch. Additionally, I am the Manager of Cross Over Trust. I grew up and currently live in Hoon Hay.Cross Over is a trust associated with South West Baptist Church. Our mission is supporting (at risk) families and communities in South Christchurch to develop resilient children of character. We work with Primary and Intermediate aged children and support local schools (Rowley, West Spreydon and Addington Primary Schools) where necessary. We also do regular visits to families and supporting according to need and carry out one on one mentoring. We have been operating in the Hoon Hay, Hillmorton, Spreydon and Addington communities for over 30 years. I am submitting in objection to the proposed changes to the Wigram boundary on the basis that it is not paying due regard to our community of interest. Through both my elected representative role and my job I have a good grasp of what constitutes our community. There is an interlocking of people, services and identities between all the communities we work in. While we work in the Addington area, I accept that putting both sides of Addington together into the Christchurch Central electorate makes sense. I believe that the neighbourhood of Addington should not be split in two (as it is on the current boundary) and instead served by a single MP. I also believe that the same can be said for Spreydon. It needs to stay as one neighbourhood in the Wigram electorate. The proposed boundary splits this neighbourhood of Spreydon in half on a boundary that has no logic on a local level. Locally, Spreydon is understood to extend at least the Selwyn Street shops on its eastern boundary. I believe that the whole of Spreydon needs to stay in Wigram because of its close connections and shared community of interest with Hoon Hay. Many of our local social service organisations work across both communities because of their commonality of need and their shared interests and identities. I grew up with playing rugby for Suburbs Rugby Club and this club illustrates the strong connections between the two neighbourhoods. We have recently acquired a new clubrooms in Domain Tce Spreydon and this facility is fast becoming a central place for individuals and groups across Spreydon, Hoon Hay and Hillmorton. Retaining the present boundaries of Wigram along Selwyn and Strickland Streets would also mean a greater alignment with the CCC boundary for the Spreydon ward. As a local community board member, I believe it is to the community’s benefit for there to be strong working relationships between the local council and community board elected members and the local MP. Having a single MP representing the whole of Spreydon would be more effective representation for the local community. My children attended West Spreydon School. In this school community there is a tight knit group of parents who see their school as central to the community. Splitting this enrolment zone across two electorates is not giving due regard to this clear community of interest. Barrington Mall, Barrington Library and Barrington Park are at the heart of our community and should not sit on the edge of Christchurch Central. They belong with the rest of Spreydon and Hoon Hay and Hillmorton. Suggested solutionThat the boundary between Wigram and Christchurch central be moved to Brougham St in the north and run South down Selwyn St to Milton St. This would reflect our community of interest. Adjustment for population could be made in other parts of the electorate where there not so strong and clear communities of interest. This solution also gives die consideration to the existing boundaries of the Wigram electorate. |
||||
S06012 | Duane Major | Objection | Boundary | |
Duane MajorObjection
Christchurch Central
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change
Duane MajorKia Ora, My name is Duane Major, I am a local in the Wigram electorate. I have lived in what I have come to call the West Spreydon neighbourhood continuously since the late 90’s, initially on Lyttelton St, then Barrington St, back to Lyttelton St, and now on [street name]. We have raised our 4 kids here. I have been part of the church on the corner of Lyttelton and Cobham Sts since the late 70’s (when I was a kid) and on staff since the late 90’s and served in a number of roles and currently the Senior Pastor at what we know call South West Baptist Church (it was Spreydon Baptist Church Till the quakes). I have previously served as the Chair of the Board of Trustees at both West Spreydon School and Hillmorton High School with a combined tenure of around 20 years.With population changes, developments, and housing density rule changes in our broader area it is understandable that changes are necessary to the electorate. It is also understandable that due to general connectivity and mobility of humans there will be no line drawn that can satisfy everyone. That said, I notice that the electorate line now goes down Lyttelton St, so participating in the process hopefully helpfully, I am submitting in objection to the proposed boundary changes to the Wigram electorate because they do not give due consideration to a strong community of interest. The proposed boundary changes split Spreydon in two and cut it off from Hoon Hay, Hillmorton and Addington where there are strong and long-standing relationships. Its particularly difficult for the neighbourhood around West Spreydon School, but also the neighbourhoods around that to the east that are rich in common interest and have a strong history of working together organisationally but also interpersonally. Also functionally e.g. supermarkets, libraries, playgrounds, school routes and so on. This was very evident post-quake for example. I am concerned that on relevant issues not sharing the same electorate creates a lack of cohesion and strength and advocacy for the people in the area’s affected. It doesn’t make a lot of sense to me to break these up, a vibrant set of neighbourhoods who benefit from having a single point of contact with the Wigram Member of Parliament. Over many decades we have developed strong working relationships with the local MP and their involvement and advocacy for a number of our initiatives has been vital. It’s a long history with ongoing healthy benefits, I reckon it might be worth reconsidering who and how it got drawn up. Anyway, here is some background. While I am connected to schools, churches, and organisations mentioned below, they are illustrative and simply my thoughts, not necessarily theirs, given the timeframe of when this issue came to my attention am not sure if they have considered it, so please bear this in mind. Our church vision wants to see strong, healthy, vibrant and woven communities. We are a Presence Based Church which has a place-based community model. We have a number of established ‘Neighbourhood Communities’. These are groups of people who live in the same neighbourhood and who are committed to sharing life in their neighbourhood together. They are committed to a people and a place. Our Neighbourhood Communities reflect the people who make them up, the places they are in, and the neighbours they know. Because of this, each community looks different, is frequently changing, and is involved with their local people and place in different ways. The proposed boundary changes would sever these communities and do not reflect what we locally understand about our “place” in this corner of Christchurch. One of the reasons we changed our name post-quake from Spreydon to South West Baptist was to reflect the increasing growth and integration of neighbourhoods as the city grew more South West to places like Wigram, Prebbleton and beyond Halswell Quarry. We have vested people and interests right across the South West of Christchurch and would like to see them remain integrated wherever possible. On the proposed boundaries our Church site on Lyttelton St would be on the edge of Christchurch Central. It would put us in a sperate electorate from a number of services and facilities we operate and partner with from our base. There are a number of trusts who work across the communities of Addington, Spreydon, Hoon Hay and Hillmorton that work in with our church and other community groups and schools. They work across these neighbourhoods because there is a common commonality of need and identity. Many of the issues such as access to warm dry housing, intensification of communities, housing intensification increasing the schools’ roles, which has led to increasing pressure on staff and school resources, and quiet spaces for students have been reduced. The cost-of-living crisis has affected many of those in our communities, affecting participation in sport, provision of basic needs, reduced volunteers due to increased pressure on whanau to work. Some of the Trusts that work across our neighbourhoods that demonstrate our shared community of interest are: • Cross Over Trust has been working in the communities of Rowley, West, Spreydon and Addington for over 30 years. Its’ mission is Growing resilient children and youth of character. Through The Primary Project (TPP), the Trust operates in the three primary schools of Rowley, West, Spreydon and Addington. TPP aimed to enhance communities by strengthening partnerships between schools and churches, utilizing local resources for shared goals. TPP introduced two key roles: School Community Liaison (SCL) and Liaison Support (formerly Activator). The SCL fosters relationships between schools and the community, while Liaison Support assists in identifying and mobilizing community talent. • Cobham St Trust provides a affordable, sustainable housing that enables all people to enjoy a fulfilled life as part of their community. Established in 1979, the Trust has a social rental housing village located at 23 Cobham Street, Spreydon Christchurch consisting of 20 one bedroom and 4 two bedroom units for seniors of limited means. It is also about to build another 12 units. This facility would now be on the boundary of Christchurch Central and would be separated from core parts of our community. • South West Youth Community Trust (SYC) South West Youth Community has been working in our local schools for over 25 years. During this time, it has changed and morphed. As a church, through the Spreydon Youth Community Trust, we partner with local schools to provide youth workers to these schools. Additionally, they run a number of youth programmes for young people in the Addington/Spreydon/Hoon Hay/Hillmorton area. • Building Blocks Community Trust run Early Learning Centres across Spreydon. Additionally, they link whanau to many other services, such as financial advice, community organisations and support services. In Spreydon we have three centres across three sites: Lyttelton St, Edingburgh St and Cobham St. These centres serve the same communities of Spreydon and Hoon Hay, but 2 of them (Lyttelton St and Edinburgh St) would be in the Wigram electorate and one in Christchurch Central (Cobham St). The Cobham St centre is only 190m from the Lyttelton St centre. This, I believe, is a clear demonstration of how our community of interest is not being given due consideration. • Project Esther Trust has been operating for over 30 years. They work with women across Spreydon, Hoon Hay and Hillmorton communities. In particular, they work with women who are parenting alone and facing significant hurdles: low incomes; social isolation; inadequate housing conditions; mental health concerns; gender discrimination… to name a few. They also have temporary/emergency accommodation for women who face difficulties and have little support. Alignment with other boundaries The commission’s proposed boundary does not align with local school zones. West Spreydon School has a boundary along Barrington Street – the proposed boundary effectively cuts this very small school boundary in half. While Chair of the BOT at this school we oversaw a massive programme of work to connect the school and the local community. As wider community (with the hands-on support of our single local Member of Parliament) we fundraised to restore our local school pool for the whole community (long but cool story). Drawing a boundary through this school zone would be detrimental to our ability to be this effective as a community in the future. Likewise, the proposed boundary ignores the east side of enrolment zone for our local High School, Hillmorton High School. The proposed boundary is also out of alignment with the local body boundary in our community. Over many years we have worked as a team with our local councillor, local community board members and our local MP. Having a coherence of representation has allowed us to develop real and meaningful relationships with a single group of representatives rather than having to replicate this across two MPs. Our relationships with all our elected representatives has benefited the communities of Addington, Spreydon, Hoon Hay and Hillmorton. Suggested solutionMy suggested solution is that the eastern boundaries of Wigram remain as they are. Instead, the commission should look to other parts of the electorate where there are stronger communities of interest with their neighbouring communities.Thanks for the opportunity to contribute to the process. |
||||
S06013 | NZ Labour Party | Objection | Boundary | |
NZ Labour PartyObjection
Christchurch Central
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change
NZ Labour PartyWe received significant representations from residents and organisations in the Christchurch suburb of Spreydon. Members of the community felt that they should not be split between Christchurch Central and Wigram, and that the portion of the suburb currently proposed to be in Christchurch Central has significant communities of interest with Wigram (namely with the rest of Spreydon and Hoon Hay). The area concerned is West of Selwyn Street, between Brougham Street in the North and Milton/ Frankleigh Streets in the South.The proposed boundary along Neville St and Barrington Street is not a boundary that makes any sense from the communities’ perspectives. There is no community or geographical rationale for dividing this community in half along this boundary. There is no other community, educational or electoral boundary that aligns with the commission’s proposal. For example: a. Residents Association – The Spreydon Neighbourhood Network has a boundary that extends to Selwyn Street in the east. The current proposed boundary eff ectively divides the Association’s area in half. b. The local body boundary extends to Antigua/Strickland Streets in the east. Again the commission’s proposed boundary eff ectively divides this ward in half. Our recommendation (below) would bring the electorate boundary more in line with the local government boundary. c. Educational boundaries - The commission’s proposed area also forms around half of the enrolment zone for West Spreydon School. The remaining half of the enrolment zone, and the school itself, remain in Wigram according to the draft boundaries. This means a significant community of interest linking this part of Spreydon with other communities within the Wigram electorate can be expected to remain in future years. Likewise, the Hillmorton High School enrolment zone extends down Selwyn St in the North along to Coronation St and then down Barrington Street. d. That area of Spreydon is currently in the Wigram electorate and residents are used to being represented through a Wigram-based MP. The most central street through Spreydon is Barrington Street. Rather than being a boundary between separate communities it forms a village centre. Barrington Mall is a centre for the community. It includes a major supermarket, pharmacy, The Warehouse, banks and post off ice facilities. There is also a major GP facility for the community located over the road from the mall. Next to the Mall is the Spreydon Library and Barrington Park. Barrington Mall is also the central public transport hub and interchange for this area of South West Christchurch. On the proposed boundaries these facilities would all be in Christchurch Central but serve the communities of Spreydon and surrounding suburbs to the west in the Wigram electorate. Locally there are strong community connections between Spreydon as a whole and the suburbs to the west of Hoon Hay and Hillmorton. Central to the provision of social services in South West Christchurch is South West Baptist Church. This church and its associated social services are a critical epicentre in the Spreydon/ Hoon Hay/ Hillmorton Communities. There is alignment of need across these communities. On the current boundaries South West Baptist Church would sit outside the Wigram electorate. Suggested solutionFor these reasons, we recommend the area of Spreydon west of Selwyn Street, between Brougham Street in the North and Milton/ Frankleigh Streets in the South, should be returned to Wigram, so that the Wigram - Christchurch Central boundary runs down Selwyn Street from the motorway all the way to Milton Street. We illustrate this recommendation on the map below.Our analysis indicates that adopting this change would drop Christchurch Central a little below the tolerance of the population quota and would mean Wigram is above the maximum allowed population. There are three knock-on changes the Commission can make elsewhere that bring these electorates back within tolerance of the quota, keep other Christchurch electorates within quota, and improve the communities of interest for the aff ected areas. The areas are: a. The area south of Yaldhurst Road bound by Racecourse Road Main South Road and Epsom Road has stronger community of interest ties with Avonhead and Russley across the other side of Yaldhurst Road and can better be represented via Ilam. b. The rural area south of Prebbleton, taking in Ladbrooks and surrounds, can be returned to Selwyn where it has been represented up to now. While Prebbleton is a suburban dormitory suburb, the areas to the South are substantially rural in their nature and have virtually no community of interests with the suburbs in Wigram. Significant local issues in this area such as the management of water races would be better represented from the Selwyn electorate. c. The area of Bishopdale that was previously in Christchurch Central but on the draft boundaries shifts to Ilam, and a small extra area of Bishopdale bordered by Harewood Ave, Highsted Road, and Sawyers Arms Road. We propose these areas should be in Christchurch Central. This move unifies the Bishopdale community in one electorate. Under this proposal, the electorate boundary would follow much of the Bishopdale School enrolment zone boundary. The Christchurch Central boundary would also more closely align with the Papanui Ward boundary in local elections than it does under the draft boundaries. Recommendation: We recommend that, as a consequence of improving the community of interest for residents of Spreydon, that the Commission also make the three small changes detailed above. Maps illustrating the changes appear below. |
||||
S07001 | Mike Michaels | Objection | Name | |
Mike MichaelsObjection
Ilam
This objection does not relate to a boundary change
This objection relates to a name change
Mike MichaelsCommunity of interest- Selwyn District would be split among 4 seats with these changes.Suggested solutionSuggest redrawing Ilam and Wigram east-west to ensure parts of Selwyn not in Selwyn District are in a single seat spanning the TLA boundarySuggest these seats be named Yaldhurst and Riccarton, as these names are of historic value |
||||
S09001 | Hamish Crombie | Objection | Boundary | |
Hamish CrombieObjection
Wigram
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change
Hamish CrombiePrebbleton is a firm part of the Selwyn District, and always has been. Many of the issues that face this community are very specific to the District, driven in a large part by the Selwyn District Council and their overarching District Plan.Moving Prebbleton into a Christchurch Electorate removes our ability to have Central Government representation that can effectively, and genuinely, advocate for our issues within the Selwyn Context. Suggested solutionPrebbleton MUST remain part of the Selwyn Electorate. |
||||
S09002 | Isaac Tabb | Objection | Boundary | |
Isaac TabbObjection
Wigram
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change
Isaac TabbPrebbleton is part of the Selwyn district council, but the electore means we are part of the Wigram area which is part of Christchurch City Council, and therefore makes it difficult as the MP would be in Christchurch, but we are situated in Selwyn geographically.Suggested solutionKeep Prebbleton in the Selwyn electroate |
||||
S09003 | James Brown | Objection | Name | |
James BrownObjection
Wigram
This objection does not relate to a boundary change
This objection relates to a name change
James BrownThe proposed boundary change significantly changes the Wigram electorate. It appears to be more than doubling in size on the map, and now includes a significant portion of West, and South West Christchurch and Selwyn district. The boundary change also means the the electorate is spread over two councils. I think the name should change to something that can reflect all areas within the newly created boundary.Suggested solutionChange the electorate name from Wigram to something that better represents the new boundary. |
||||
S09004 | Mrs Faye Parfitt | Objection | Boundary | |
Mrs Faye ParfittObjection
Wigram
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change
Mrs Faye ParfittWigram Electorate.I realise that Prebbleton's population has a high projected population growth rate, but historically it has been a rural district and still has a rural flavour, so therefore identifies more with the Selwyn district lifestyles . Our current MP lives in Prebbleton and has been a solid campaigner for Selwyn, and in return she has many loyal constituents. I don't see many voters from Prebbleton being fervent contributors to the Wigram electorate. People tend to come and make their home in Prebbleton because of its 'out-of-town- but-close-enough' location and politics. So joining an electorate that includes mainly CIty suburbs does not reflect the lifestyle preferences of Prebbleton residents. Suggested solutionIf the Selwyn district needs to remove 11,800 voters, wouldn't it be more appropriate to start with a reduction in the southern areas of the electorate and combine them with South Canterbury, because then residents can continue to uphold and discuss rural-township politics, rather than City-suburban issues. |
||||
S09006 | Karl Swart | Objection | Boundary | |
Karl SwartObjection
Wigram
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change
Karl SwartIt seems politically motivated to have the boundaries redrawn in a way that mostly will result in electorates swinging to the right. This seems like gerrymandering, especially given that we currently have a centre right government. The wigram electorate has been a left wing electorate for every election since it was established but redrawing the boundary looks to result in the electorate swinging based on last election results. The same is true for most of the electorates that will be redrawn. This seems like a manipulation of the election to meSuggested solutionResraw the electorates to retain the same socioeconomic makeup that the current electorates represent |
||||
S09007 | Larissa Mitchell | Objection | Boundary | |
Larissa MitchellObjection
Wigram
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change
Larissa MitchellI object to Prebbleton being included in the wigram electorate when we are under different councils.Suggested solutionLeave Prebbleton with the other Selwyn district towns |
||||
S09008 | Tracy Clough | Objection | Boundary | |
Tracy CloughObjection
Wigram
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change
Tracy CloughMoving Prebbleton into the Wigram electorate.Prebbleton is under the Selwyn District Council, existing Wigram electorate boundary is Christchurch Disrtict. How would the MP represent the views of its constituents when they could be of conflict due to suburb/council? It is more likely the ‘pressing issues” would end up prioritizing those who are under one council. Would have no confidence that any elected MP could fairly and evenly represent the electorate given the two large District Council and differing District Plans. Suggested solutionEnsure electorate boundaries align with district councils.If population is rapidly growing in Selwyn, then maybe a new electorate should be formed. NZ population is not decreasing so there will always be the same issue. |
||||
S09009 | Diane White | Objection | Boundary | |
Diane WhiteObjection
Wigram
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change
Diane WhiteI object to Prebbleton being moved into Wigram electorate.We are Selwyn semi rural , to be put into Wigram which is dense housing and industrial is not representing us at all . Like putting Remuera in with Otara . Just for numbers , totally alien . Our voting will not help the industrial area either as will not represent their needs .Suggested solutionIncrease the numbers for Selwyn so we can stay with our own type . This is not just a numbers game this is peoples votes . |
||||
S09010 | Mrs Brydie Rudd | Objection | Boundary | |
Mrs Brydie RuddObjection
Wigram
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change
Mrs Brydie RuddWith the proposed boundary for Wigram electorate being moved to include Prebbleton/Ladbrooks you are moving what is a rural community into that of a non-rural/residential community.The needs and values of Prebbleton do not align to those of the current Wigram electorate and to elect an individual to represent both communities fairly would be impractical. |
||||
S09011 | Hufsa Junaid | Objection | Boundary, name | |
Hufsa JunaidObjection
Wigram
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection relates to a name change
Hufsa JunaidWe are part of selwyn and separate from wigram.Suggested solutionLeave us be. |
||||
S09012 | Mrs Sandra Downs | Objection | Boundary | |
Mrs Sandra DownsObjection
Wigram
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change
Mrs Sandra DownsI wish to object to Prebbleton being included in the Wigram electorate, as part of the current boundary change.We are part of the Selwyn district and under the Selwyn council and Not part of Christchurch. Suggested solutionTo Not change the electoral boundary, but instead keep Prebbleton as part of the Selwyn electorate. |
||||
S09013 | Mrs Lynette Anderson | Objection | Boundary | |
Mrs Lynette AndersonObjection
Wigram
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change
Mrs Lynette AndersonPrebbleton moving into Wigram Electorate.I strongly propose that this move be not made. Why try and fix something that is not broken leave it alone |
||||
S09014 | T Barrett | Objection | Boundary | |
T BarrettObjection
Wigram
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change
T BarrettPrebbleton is part of the Selwyn district and has different community and infrastructure isdurs that will not be met by the Wigram electorate that is city based and has different needs and which is in the Christchurch council district.MP’s should live and be from the district they live in, this would not be the case if Prebbleton became part of Wigram and a city electorate. Suggested solutionNo change, or amend Wigram to be part of another Christchurch electorate. |
||||
S09015 | S D [No full name provided] | Objection | Boundary | |
S D [No full name provided]Objection
Wigram
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change
S D [No full name provided]Wigram ElectorateI object to the Prebbleton Electorate being moved from Selwyn to Wigram. This is completely non-sensical. If Prebbleton is still to maintain its rates base in Selwyn but be part of the Wigram Electorate, this sets the scene for a complete bureaucratic nightmare especially in terms of Central Government funding (NZTA). This is ludicrous. Wigram Politicians could care less about the needs of Prebbleton. This has never been a consideration for them and never will. It is likely they will refer all Prebbleton resident concerns to SDC to deal with. Prebbleton residents will be caught in the middle of this bureaucratic bungle and the infrastructure of our town will crumble as a result. We are already subject to less consideration for funds than Lincoln and Rolleston even though we pay higher rates than our counterparts. Suggested solutionThe Motorway that separates Prebbleton from Wigram SHOULD BE THE DIVIDING LINE.All Selwyn towns on the North side of the Motorway (Kirwee; West Melton; Darfield; Methven; Coalgate; Glentunnel etc) should be morphed into Waimakariri; Wigram; Hornby or Ilam Electorates. |