Skip to main content Skip to navigation within this section

View objections

Objections to the proposed electorates and boundaries are listed below.

Submissions may have been edited to remove contact information or other personal details, or to remove objectionable material. Submissions which only address issues the Representation Commission cannot consider have not been published.

Between 8 and 21 May you can have your say on issues raised in these objections.

How to have your say

Select filters to view submissions

Displaying 181 - 210 of 636
Number Name Submission Change type View
N13144 Mr Yang Zhang Objection Boundary

Mr Yang Zhang

Objection

Mt Albert
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Mr Yang Zhang

We live on [street name], mt eden. I’d like to object to the proposal that to change our electorate from Epsom to Mt Albert.
1. Our day to day life happen in mt Eden, our shopping, restaurant and cafes are our locals in mt Eden, not mt Albert. Last time we visited mt Albert was months ago.
2. We are actively involved in the local mt Eden community, my son goes to mt Eden primary, daughter goes to school in epsom. Their sport clubs, after school cares and other extra curricula activities are all local to mt eden. majority of their friends and our friends reside locally in epsom and mt Eden area.
3. By and large our value aligns with our mt Eden community.
4. I am confused by the proposal to include areas around ellerslie race course in the Epsom electorate. It does not make sense that to include a more geographical distant area in the electorate at the same time remove our area which is geographically close to the centre of Epsom electorate.

Suggested solution

1. Keep our area [street name] and adjacent streets in the Epsom electorate
2. Include [street name] in Auckland Grammar School to align our day to days with the community
N13145 Mr Mark Matthews Objection Boundary

Mr Mark Matthews

Objection

Mt Albert
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Mr Mark Matthews

I would like to object to the proposed boundary change to the Epsom electorate. Especially the area North of balmoral road being moved into the Mt Albert electorate. I have lived in Mt Eden, [street name] for over 25 years. Our children have grown up here. We associate ourselves as Mt Eden and regularly use the facilities in the Mt Eden village which is under 10 minutes walk. Mt Eden itself and surrounding green areas are our usual exercise areas . We have no affiliation with Mt Albert or its community. I can not remember when I last visited the commercial area. I believe it makes sense that any boundary changes reflect local community.

Suggested solution

Maintain at least this small area north of balamoral remain in the Epsom area and its community.
N13146 Mrs Miriam Hartmann Objection Boundary

Mrs Miriam Hartmann

Objection

Mt Albert
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Mrs Miriam Hartmann

I would like to submit to the Boundaries Commission in regards to the moving of part of the Wesley area currently in Mt Roskill into the Mt Albert electorate. I am not in favour of this move. I have resided in Mt Roskill for 24 years, and the Wesley area has always been a stronghold of Mt Roskill. In fact, many children from
Wesley have attended the schools my children attended, which are Mt Roskill Intermediate and Mt Roskill Grammar. Therefore, the ties between the two areas are very strong. In addition, Oakley Creek runs right through Mt Roskill and continues through Wesley. With the awesome naturalisation which has occurred along part of its banks, I find that as a cyclist I use these riverside pathways regularly. Having an off road cycle path has enabled me to more safely get to places north of where I live in Three Kings (Mt Roskill). This cycle path is a great way to get to the Wesley Community centre, where I have attended many community meetings. The Fickling Centre in Three Kings is closer to me. However, it is not a drop-in community centre as such, but is a Council for-hire facility. That is not the case at Wesley, where community members can enter and meet. Therefore, to have the linkages between ammenities in both Wesley and Three Kings is important to me. Flooding issues over the last couple of years have often centred around Oakley Creek. These are being addressed through environmental restoration, spearheaded by local leaders and community members. When flooding does happen, a cohesive approach to the river and its immediate neighbours is helpful to those affected. For example, a community-led group called The Wesley and Roskill Recovery Leadership Rōpū is ensuring communities lead their own recovery. The fact that Oakley Creek flows through the Mt Roskill and Wesley areas is an indication to me that the Mt Roskill electorate should continue to encompass Oakley Creek at Wesley, because people in those areas are connected to each other and the creek through historical precedent.

Suggested solution

I would suggest that Oakley Creek, including the houses to the north of the Creek be the natural boundary of the Mt Roskill Electorate. Therefore, these roads would be the boundary: Triton, Aurora, Sheppard, Gifford, etc, in order to keep Oakley Creek, an important geographical and spiritual feature of the landscape intact for communities. Perhaps the Mt Albert boundary could be moved towards Arch Hill as a corresponding measure.
N13147 Ms N Khouri Objection Boundary

Ms N Khouri

Objection

Mt Albert
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Ms N Khouri

My street [street name] is proposed to move from Epsom Electorate to Mt Albert. I object to this. My family identifies culturally and socially with Mt Eden and Epsom. We do not identify with Mt Albert. Kohia Terrace School in Gillies Ave is my children’s primary school and next year my daughter will attend Epsom Girls Grammar, for which we are in zone. We worry that if the boundaries are changed the Epsom Girls Grammar and Auckland Grammar may exclude us from the zone. My younger child wishes to attend Auckland Grammar in 3 years and we bought our house in this location to enable that. I grew up in Mt Eden and have always identified with the Epsom electorate.

Suggested solution

Leave [street name] in the Epsom electorate please.
N13148 Mr Peter Carlson Objection Boundary

Mr Peter Carlson

Objection

Mt Albert
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Mr Peter Carlson

We have a long term rental we are renting in Mt Eden [street name]
This house we have made our home
By moving the Boundaries we would the.n be outside the school zones of what is called the Grammar zone and Epson Girls ,this will effect my Children’s education which is not on .. this part of Mt Eden is far closer to Epson that other Areas that are so called Epson Zoning

Suggested solution

Do not move this part of Ny Eden out of the Zone of needed move another Part that is no where near Epson
N13149 Kristina Cooper Objection Boundary

Kristina Cooper

Objection

Mt Albert
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Kristina Cooper

Our house in is [street name] currently in the Epsom electorate and is being proposed to be moved to the Mt Albert electorate which we vociferously object to and feel disassociated from. Our household has no association or identity with Mt Albert - we do not shop, go to school, undertake any leisure activities, walk or drive through Mt Albert. In short - we have nothing to do with Mt Albert and feel completely disassociated from it and the proposal [street name] be part of the Mt Albert electorate. We shop in the Mt Eden village and Espom/Newmarket, our children were educated in Epsom, we walk and exercise within Mt Eden and Epsom. Mt Eden/Epsom is our local village and our home and we feel an identity to it and the Epsom electorate.

Suggested solution

The roads of Woodside Road, Kingsview Road, Mont le Grande Henley Street (ie the rectangle from Woodside Road/Mont le Grand to dominion road, down to St Lukes road, and back up Mt Eden road to the intersection of woodside road) should remain within the Epsom electorate. The carve out of this area to be part of the Mt Albert electorate is an anomaly.
N13150 Kristina Cooper Objection Boundary

Kristina Cooper

Objection

Mt Albert
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Kristina Cooper

I object to the area of woodside road/mont le grand, kings view road and henley road down to Balmoral Road being removed from the Epsom electorate and instead being placed into the Mt Albert electorate. our family has no association with or link to Mt Albert. our shopping, leisure, exercise and schooling is all within the Mt Eden / Epsom area. We identify with Mt Eden / Epsom and have no identify with Mt Albert. The carve out of this rectangle of streets to be moved out of the Epsom electorate to the Mt Albert electorate makes no sence.

Suggested solution

the area of woodside road/mont le grand, kingsview road and henley road down to Balmoral Road should remain within the Epsom electorate and not be moved into the Mt Albert electorate.
N13151 Mr Cameron Curtis Objection Boundary

Mr Cameron Curtis

Objection

Mt Albert
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Mr Cameron Curtis

Submission on Proposed Electoral Boundary Changes to Epsom Electorate

I wish to object to the proposed changes that would move my area from the Epsom electorate into Mt Albert. I have strong and longstanding personal, community, and professional ties to Mt Eden and the wider Epsom area.

My connections — including schooling, local services, community groups, and social networks — are firmly based in Epsom. Being connected to the local representatives of Epsom is very important and being shifted into Mt Albert would disrupt these relationships and diminish my ability to participate fully in the community I am most connected to.

I respectfully request that the boundaries are unchanged to retain my area within the Epsom electorate to reflect these strong, established community links.

Thank you for considering my submission.

Suggested solution

Leave the Epsom boundary as it is.
N13152 Mr Kevin Adair Objection Boundary

Mr Kevin Adair

Objection

Mt Albert
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Mr Kevin Adair

My family have lived in [street name] for 20 years, This area is pretty Eden-Epsom. We probably shop at the Dominion rd Woolworths, walk up Mt Eden on a Saturday (not Mt Albert), go to Mt Eden De Post for a drink (not Albert's Post), play in Potter's Park (not Rocket Park), etc. I feel like our voting interests would pertain to facilities in Eden-Epsom rather than Mt Albert.

Suggested solution

Keep the homes north of Balmoral Rd, and East of Dominion Rd in the Epsom electorate .
N13153 Ms Yanni Wang Objection Boundary

Ms Yanni Wang

Objection

Mt Albert
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Ms Yanni Wang

we object the boundary change of Mt albert electorate, in particular area from north of balmoral road to Herbert road, Croydon and Fairview roads from Epson electorate. reasons are:
1. our daily life, shopping, take away dinning and other activities happen in Mt Eden, not Mt Albert. It makes sense we stay in Epsom electorate
2. our kids goes to school in Mt Eden and Epsom. Our friends, their friends are all in the area. We participate in the in the Mt Eden community.
3. this area is geographically closer to Epsom electorate
4. Our value aligns to those of Mt Eden community

Suggested solution

keep this area in Epsom electorate.
N13154 Miss Emma Lum Objection Boundary

Miss Emma Lum

Objection

Mt Albert
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Miss Emma Lum

I have lived in the same place, epsom my whole life and I attended school in this area all the way from primary to end of high school. All of my community and connections are within the Epsom area and I have zero affiliations with the Mt Albert electorate. I am objecting to this area becoming a part of the Mt Albert electorate as it would uproot the connections I have in the Epsom electorate and community.
N13155 Sandra Lum Objection Boundary

Sandra Lum

Objection

Mt Albert
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Sandra Lum

I have lived at the same address in the Epsom electorate for 20 years. My daughter attended Epsom Girls Grammar and my son currently attends Auckland Grammar. All our community affiliations are within the Epsom electorate and we have no connection with the Mt Albert electorate.

I object to part of the Epsom electorate being moved to become part of the Mt Albert electorate. It does not make sense for us to be part of another electorate when we have roots in the Epsom electorate.
N13156 Mr Martyn Watts Objection Boundary

Mr Martyn Watts

Objection

Mt Albert
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Mr Martyn Watts

Whilst we appreciate the difficult job the Electoral Commission has in balancing out the various electorates into reasonably equal populations, we were shocked at the current proposal to move [street name] (and other neighbouring streets north of Balmoral) into the Mount Albert electorate. [street name] is at the very heart of Mount Eden village, which is a centre for amenity for the Epsom area. Our community, schooling (Mt Eden Primary, Auckland Grammar, Epsom Girls), health service access and infrastructure is all centred on the Mount Eden and Epsom area. We have absolutely no association with the Mount Albert community, or its resources, and would have no confidence that any of our Eden/Epsom specfic concerns would be adequately represented. We would only feel fairly served by an MP elected to represent the Eden/Epsom area.

Suggested solution

In the absence of all the relevant population data, we could only suggest that households at the heart of the amenity within an electorate, like ours, rationally and fairly belong in that electorate.
N13157 Andrew Lum Objection Boundary

Andrew Lum

Objection

Mt Albert
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Andrew Lum

Objection to proposed Epsom electrolyte boundary changes

Having lived in the Epsom Electorate boundaries for well over 20 years my affiliations is aligned my sense of being part of the Epsom community. My children have are all going or have been to schools in this boundary and have close relationships with the Epsom community. I also like my local MP for this electorate and relate to his ideals and ideas for my local community. I have not build up any relationship with Mount Albert and have not been involved in anything in that community or used any of their facilities. I have established a great sense of connectivity to the Epsom community and am proud to be part of this area
N13158 John, Anne, & Chris Khouri Objection Boundary

John, Anne, & Chris Khouri

Objection

Mt Albert
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

John, Anne, & Chris Khouri

We live within 100 metres of Mt Eden Rd & consider that we are part of the Mt Eden community. The Mt Albert suburb is many kilometres away from us and we think that that the Member of Parliament for that area could not meaningfully relate to the needs of our neighbourhood and local community.

Suggested solution

That the existing boundary for our local area should not be changed.
N13159 Ms Haiying Li Objection Boundary

Ms Haiying Li

Objection

Mt Albert
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Ms Haiying Li

Mt Albert electorate.
I am objecting to our [street name] area being moved from the Epsom electprate into Mount Albert electorate.
Our children all go to school in Epsom and we have very strong links with Epsom as a family, with relatives and neighbours. We all want keep our family and our neighbourhood together and to remain part of the Epsom electorate.
N13160 John Hill Objection Boundary

John Hill

Objection

Mt Albert
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

John Hill

I and my household have been resident for many years in the area bounded by Mt Eden, Balmoral, Dominion, Herbert, Croydon and Fairview roads, an area currently in the Epsom electorate but which is proposed to move to the Mt Albert electorate. I strongly oppose this change.

I've never before felt so disenfranchised from local electoral representation.

Mt Eden/Epsom is our home. Mt Eden village is our local shops. Our children were educated in Epsom. Maungawhau is our local mountain. We walk and undertake leisure activities in Mt Eden and Epsom. We feel connected to Mt Eden and Epsom. Even the rock under our yard is from eruptions of Maungawhau/Mt Eden. The main thoroughfares of Dominion Road and Balmoral Road frame our area, tying it to Mt Eden/Epsom, not to Mt Albert.

Our household has no association or identification with Mt Albert. We do not shop, undertake leisure activities, go to school, walk, or drive through Mt Albert. We feel completely dissociated from Mt Albert.

If the proposed electoral boundary change takes place, we may as well be electorally represented in another city.

Suggested solution

The area bounded by Mt Eden, Balmoral, Dominion, Herbert, Croydon and Fairview roads should remain in the Epsom electorate. It is an anomaly to carve this area out, sitting on the volcanic rock of Mt Eden and to misplace the area within the Mt Albert electorate.
N13162 Ms Jacqueline Wise Objection Boundary

Ms Jacqueline Wise

Objection

Mt Albert
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Ms Jacqueline Wise

My objection is to being moved from the Epsom electorate to the Mt Albert electorate. My sister and I have lived in parts of the Epsom electorate for 54 years. We both taught at St Cuthbert's College for a combined total of 59 years, and are still part of the college 'family'. We feel markedly more in tune with the values and objectives of this area, and more comfortable with the people who live here. (Our dentist and hairdresser are both still in Epsom, too.) Another reason for the objection is that we value Paul Goldsmith, and have known his parents for more than 50 years.
Basically, we would feel 'displaced' if the boundaries were moved and we were banished from this area.

Suggested solution

Leave [street name] in the Eden-Epsom electorate.
N13163 Ms Sherrie Mutong Gao Objection Boundary

Ms Sherrie Mutong Gao

Objection

Mt Albert
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Ms Sherrie Mutong Gao

I don't support the change of [street name] splitting out of Mount Eden to Mount Albert. Epsom is an electorate that places a strong emphasis on education. The change would undermine the strong community of interest. People in Epsom have long voted for local representatives who share our values of aspiration and education.

Suggested solution

Keep the current boundaries of the Epsom electorate. The proposed change does not make sense!
N13164 Nicholas Hill Objection Boundary

Nicholas Hill

Objection

Mt Albert
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Nicholas Hill

Objection & reasons
I and my household have been resident for many years in the area bounded by Mt Eden, Balmoral, Dominion, Herbert, Croydon and Fairview roads, an area currently and as long as we've lived here, in the Epsom electorate but which is proposed to move to the Mt Albert electorate. I strongly oppose this change.

I've never before felt so disenfranchised from local electoral representation.

Mt Eden/Epsom is our home. Mt Eden village is our local shops. Our children were educated in Epsom. Maungawhau is our local mountain. We walk and undertake leisure activities in Mt Eden and Epsom. We feel connected to Mt Eden and Epsom. Even the rock under our yard is from eruptions of Maungawhau/Mt Eden. The main thoroughfares of Dominion Road and Balmoral Road frame our area, tying it to Mt Eden/Epsom, not to Mt Albert.

Our household has no association or identification with Mt Albert. We do not shop, undertake leisure activities, go to school, walk, or drive through Mt Albert. We feel completely dissociated from Mt Albert.

If the proposed electoral boundary change takes place, we may as well be electorally represented in another city.

Suggested solution

Suggested solution
The area bounded by Mt Eden, Balmoral, Dominion, Herbert, Croydon and Fairview roads should remain in the Epsom electorate. It is an anomaly to carve this area out, sitting on the volcanic rock of Mt Eden and to misplace the area within the Mt Albert electorate.
N13165 Mr and Mrs Peng and Swan Leong and Ong Objection Boundary

Mr and Mrs Peng and Swan Leong and Ong

Objection

Mt Albert
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Mr and Mrs Peng and Swan Leong and Ong

We object the Representation Commission proposal to carve out about a square kilometre from the Epsom Electorate, thus weakening the National and Act dominance.
Who are these Commission Representatives making such decision? Are these representatives Labour or Green leaning members? Is this the Labour/Green gerrymandering?

Suggested solution

We like the Epsom Electorate boundary to remain the same and untouched.
N13166 Ms Josette Prince Objection Boundary

Ms Josette Prince

Objection

Mt Albert
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Ms Josette Prince

We brought our house at [number] Woodside Rd Mt Eden just over 2 years ago for [amount] and paid this price as it is double grammar zone for both Epsom Girls and Auckland Grammar. We paid a significant premium for our home and for our children and future generations as EGGS and AGS are only 25 mins walk from our home.
We are currently in the Epsom electorate and Epsom shops are only 28 minutes walk and our local Mt Eden Village shops are less than 500m from our house and only 8 minutes walk.
You are proposing we become part of Mt Albert Electorate and Mt Albert is over 1 hour walk from our home which is ludicrous!

Suggested solution

Electorate boundaries should be in close proximity of the heart of the electorate which in our case is Epsom.
We do not understand why the Epsom electorate boundary proposal would be adding 9% from Auckland central (Newton, Grafton and Domain becoming part of Epsom) and adding
3% from Maungakiekie (south of Greenlane Road West to Ellerslie) and that you would be adding these when both of these areas are significantly further away from Epsom than Woodside Road in Mt Eden.
We recommend you leave the area north of Balmoral Road including Woodside Road, Kingsview Road and Henley Road unchanged from its current boundary today where we are in the Epsom electorate and that you leave the boundary for Auckland Central Newton in its current position rather than adding 9% to Epsom Electorate.
I also question why the Epsom Electorate would extend through to Orakei and Meadowbank which are so far from Epsom and suggest they become part of the electorate that includes Meadowbank, Orakei, Mission Bay and St Helier's.
N13167 Mr William Carlson Objection Boundary

Mr William Carlson

Objection

Mt Albert
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Mr William Carlson

Why are you changing the boundary of streets like [street name] Mt Eden when it is very close to Epsom and no where Near Mt Albert
Leave as it is in this area around [street name] Mt Eden

Suggested solution

Leave this area alone in Mt Eden
N13168 Ms Gayatri Jaduram Objection Boundary

Ms Gayatri Jaduram

Objection

Mt Albert
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Ms Gayatri Jaduram

I object to the boundary change to Electorate B for the following reasons:
a. The 3% proposed to be removed from the block I live in is within Dominion Road and Balmoral Road (a significant arterial boundary). I would have thought it would make more sense to reposition the boundary change for Eden Terrace - I understand the proposal is to move that area from Auckland Central to Epsom.

b. In my day to day life ( e.g. shopping and leisure) I go to Mt Eden not Mt Albert. I do not have an association with Mt Albert. I would not be voting for a Mt Albert electorate MP as my community is Mt Eden.

c. Although we are not in the Auckland Grammar School (AGS) zone, there are some streets (which are proposed to be moved to the Mt Albert electorate) which are, and it is quite possible AGS would change its zone affecting those residents accordingly.

d. I am in the Epsom Girls Grammar (EGGS) zone, which I understand has historically aligned its zone closely with the Epsom boundary. That could change if the proposed change goes ahead.

Suggested solution

reposition the boundary change for Eden Terrace
N13169 Anneta Hunt Objection Boundary

Anneta Hunt

Objection

Mt Albert
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Anneta Hunt

Moving [street name] Mt Eden from the Epsom electorate to Mt Albert.

I believe [street name] is part of the Eden / Epsom community and should not be moved
N13170 Mrs Melinda Henzell Objection Boundary

Mrs Melinda Henzell

Objection

Mt Albert
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Mrs Melinda Henzell

My objection is to [street name] being moved to the Mt Albert electorate. We are very close to Mt Eden village, that is our local community and the schools we are zoned for are in Epsom.
N13171 Fan Zhang Objection Boundary, name

Fan Zhang

Objection

Mt Albert
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection relates to a name change

Fan Zhang

I object moving an area north of balmoral road (between potters park to Mt Eden Road) from Epsom electorate to Mt Albert.
I live here for more than 5years and my family always like to walk up to Mt Eden summit and join the events in Mt Eden and Epsom community. My young children go to Kindy in Epsom and my older kids are looking to Epsom girls Grammar for high school in the near future. Our whole family is connected with Mt Eden and Epsom community.
N13172 Mrs Vanessa Scott Objection Boundary

Mrs Vanessa Scott

Objection

Mt Albert
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Mrs Vanessa Scott

I wish to make an objection to the proposed removal of some Mt Eden residents from the Epsom electorate to the Mt Albert electorate.

As a resident of Mt Eden, we use the village for our day to day lives. It is a short walk from our home. We frequent the cafes and restaurants, walk up the mountain many times each week (with the dog), and enjoy all the other things that the community has to offer.

Our children attended local schools and were able to walk or bike to school from Mt Eden. We purposefully chose the Double-Grammar zone for their education and accepted that we paid a premium for this choice. We understood that the Epsom Girls Grammar School zoning is based on the electorate.

Comparatively, Mount Albert is a 10min drive. We do not know any of the cafes etc, our children did not go to Mt Albert Grammar or any other Mt Albert school, it is not where we live, it is not our community.

Knowing that we have an elected MP who represents our community is key, a person who knows the neighbourhood, the village and our concerns. The level of representation of our part of Mt Eden would be negatively affected if that MP is not a local and loyal member of the our own community.

Suggested solution

Rather than removing some of the residents from the Epsom electorate, I would suggest that a solution be found to not add residents from other electorates.
I would imagine that those residents would be equally disappointed to be placed in an electorate where they simply do not live out their day-to-day lives.
N13173 Angela Pearce Objection Boundary

Angela Pearce

Objection

Mt Albert
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Angela Pearce

I am objecting to the proposal to move the area north of Balmoral Road up to Herbert, Croydon and Fairview Roads along to Mt Eden Road from the Epsom electorate to the Mt Albert electorate. My family currently resides in [street name] and we consider Mt Eden including the Mt Eden village and surrounding facilities an integral part of our lives. It does not make sense to move this area to within the Mt Albert electorate as the majority of residents look to Mt Eden not Mt Albert for their daily lives. This change would also split the school zone for Epsom Girls Grammar affecting the property value of every house in the area and creating potential zoning issues for families in the area who have paid a premium to be in the school zone.

Suggested solution

That the boundary change is repositioned for Eden Terrace.
N13174 Mr Todd Eglinton Objection Boundary

Mr Todd Eglinton

Objection

Mt Albert
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Mr Todd Eglinton

I understand the commission have recommended that our area of several streets becomes separated from Epsom and "moved" to Mt Albert. I object on the basis that we are part of Mt Eden and as such Epsom. There is a clear physical boundary - being Greenlane Rd. A change I feel separates us from our Maunga and our village.

Suggested solution

No change to our street (and immediate surrounding)
Back to top